Eric, http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/05/al-gores-movie/ ,in a favorable reviews, says the Al Gore movie tries to educate the people about the global warming and how important it is. Most of the slides and statistics sound boring but we should see them and know how the earth is getting compared negatively with several past years. Al Gore travelled to different regions in the world to prove his study. Al Gore’s movie contain few scientific errors but these small mistakes does not take away from his main point. Finally in Eric’s opinion he said that United States has the ability to impact the future of climate change.
Paul, http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2006/09/11/an_inconvenient_truth_2006_review.shtml ,in a more negative review, points out that Al Gore is unfortunately not a movie star; he is a fat guy and sometimes seems like a frog. Anyone who see his movie will not be able to specify if it’s drama or documentary. Inconvenient Truth was a power point show and it was not interesting. Al Gore shows his movie all around the world and while he is presenting the slides to the audience and showing us how people are destroying the earth I feel bored about it. More over the presentation is full of charts, graphs and some horrifying statistics; all of that gives the same idea so it is wasting time.
In my opinion I agree with the first review because Eric talks in general about what Al Gore was doing to prove his theory and how he is trying to make the people understand what is happening to our earth. Moreover what makes me agree more with the first article is that Eric talks in general and he also mentioned Al Gore’s mistakes. In the other hand I don’t care about the physical appearance because Paul mentioned that in his review in the beginning.
No comments:
Post a Comment